Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Strategies in Restoring Public Trust in Government Institutions in Uganda

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of anti-corruption strategies in restoring public trust in government institutions in Uganda. Specifically, it analyzed the anti-corruption strategies implemented, assessed their effectiveness in reducing corruption, and examined their influence on public trust. A mixed-methods approach based on a cross-sectional research design was adopted. Data were collected from a sample of 278 respondents drawn from public officials and citizens, using structured questionnaires and interview guides. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that although anti-corruption strategies such as legal frameworks, transparency initiatives, whistleblowing mechanisms, and institutional oversight structures were in place, their effectiveness was uneven. Transparency initiatives showed relatively positive outcomes, while enforcement of laws, institutional independence, and reporting mechanisms were perceived as less effective. Corruption was found to persist, particularly in procurement and administrative processes, while public trust in government institutions remained low. The study concluded that the existence of anti-corruption strategies alone was insufficient to restore public trust without consistent enforcement, institutional autonomy, and visible accountability. It recommended strengthening enforcement mechanisms, enhancing institutional independence, improving public awareness and reporting systems, and linking anti-corruption efforts to improved service delivery to rebuild public confidence.