Application of Effective Training Methods to Achieve Positive Learning Outcomes and to Facilitate Optimum Performance at the Workplace

by Ferdous Azam, Mazuki Jusoh, Upendra Ranaweera

Published: February 9, 2026 • DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100405

Abstract

Transfer of training accorded to employees at the work place is increasingly becoming the focus of contemporary researchers. The intensity of competition in the world of is ever increasing. Adding to the complexities in justifying training expenditure is the intangible nature of the product. Using a systematic literature review method, 45 peer reviewed articles were analyzed to identify key factors influencing training effectiveness. The review synthesizes evidence on how structured training approaches—spanning reaction, learning, behaviour, and results—support sustainable skill development and organizational impact. Many scholars have made revelations on the subject of training transfer and Donald Kirkpatrick (1959) with his four level Kirkpatrick model (KM) has been highlighted for over six decades. Many of these scholars who have expressed views on the transfer of training contend that Models such as Baldwin and Ford’s Transfer of Training and Holton’s Learning Transfer System Inventory are examined to highlight the role of learner motivation, organizational climate, and contextual alignment in maximizing transfer. Findings suggest that integrating evaluation models with workplace specific training design enhances both individual competencies and organizational outcomes. of training transfer. However, there has been no absence of critics of the KM. Notable critics of the KM include Alliger and Janak (1989), Phillips (1996) and Saidi, Fung, Turner and Lim (2024), suggesting that arguments for and against the Kirkpatrick model and the subject of training transfer will continue in to the future too. Mehner, Rothenbuch and Kaufeld (2025) and Alam and Islam (2025) were the last of for many scholars to support the KM. This literature review paper is intended to contribute more on the subject of “transfer of training into workplace behaviour”, to the knowledge base already available in the academic world. The intent of doing so is to delve deeply into a specific area.