On Driving Operational Excellence, How Continuous Improvement Culture Minimizes the Effect of Seasonality in the Agricultural Seed Industry: A Literature Review
by Andy James D. Wong, Monsour A. Pelmin
Published: May 29, 2026 • DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500287
Abstract
The hybrid seed industry operates under extreme seasonality, where fixed biological planting and harvesting windows contrast with the need for consistent industrial processing. In a CI (Continuous Improvement) culture, this creates a unique tension: how do you maintain "continuous" progress when the plant oscillates between 0% and 200% capacity?
This article examines related literatures that emphasizes and studied Continuous improvement (Kaizen) in the agricultural manufacturing industry Continuous Improvement (CI) has been extensively studied in manufacturing and is widely recognized for enhancing productivity, profitability, and operational performance (Turovski, 2024). However, its application within the agricultural sector remains limited, with existing studies often focusing on isolated stages rather than the entire value chain.
This study aims to bridge this gap by examining how CI can be integrated from field operations to plant processing within the hybrid seed industry. This will try to integrate established discipline in Continuous Improvement and create/propose a framework that might be adopted by various organizations in these industries.
Based on the review of related literature, it was concluded that there are 4 major principles of Continuous Improvement that can be implemented to addressed the seasonality of this industry. These include: (1) leveling the biological load (Heijunka), (2) managing seasonal workforce through standardized work, (3) shifting focus from production to maintenance using Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), and (4) managing quality variability through Six Sigma.
It is also found out that no specific Continuous Improvement principle can singlehandedly resolve the issue but rather it was discovered the Elasticity logic of the proposed framework. The unique contribution of the framework is the concept of Continuous Improvement elasticity. Specifically, during high-load periods (100–200%), CI becomes rigid, emphasizing strict adherence to standard work and implementation are rapid and continuous to avoid delays and downtime, especially on the single line’s operations. In contrast, during low-load periods (0–20%), CI becomes more flexible, encouraging innovation and process redesign.
Having in place the Continuous improvement principles in the industry, this will increase profitability, efficiency, reduce cost, achieve optimum quality, retained skilled personnel and others. The proposed framework moves the hybrid seed industry from a Crisis-Response model to a Proactive-Sync model, where the off-season builds the capability that the peak season implements.