Students’ Uptake of Written Corrective Feedback Using Error Correction Codes in EFL Writing

Abstract

This study investigates how English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students respond to Written Corrective Feedback (WCF), particularly when it is provided in the form of coded error feedback in their writing. Written corrective feedback is widely used in second language writing instruction to help learners identify and correct linguistic errors, yet students’ ability to interpret and effectively apply such feedback varies considerably. Understanding how learners engage with coded feedback can provide valuable insights into the role of feedback in supporting language development.
Using a qualitative research design, data were collected from 10 university-level EFL students who were asked to revise their written drafts after receiving coded feedback from their instructor. The feedback consisted of standardized error codes indicating specific grammatical or language-related issues. The study analyzes the students’ original and revised drafts in order to examine how they interpreted the feedback and to what extent they were able to successfully revise their errors.
The findings indicate that when students clearly understand the meaning of the feedback codes, they are generally able to make accurate revisions, suggesting active engagement with language rules and the development of self-editing strategies. However, cases of partial or incorrect revisions reveal that some learners experience difficulty interpreting the codes or applying them appropriately. In addition, uncorrected errors in the revised drafts may reflect factors such as limited motivation, lack of confidence, or unclear feedback. These findings support previous research (e.g., Hyland & Hyland, 2006) highlighting the importance of context-sensitive feedback practices. The study recommends combining focused WCF with opportunities for teacher guidance, discussion, or peer collaboration to improve learners’ understanding and uptake. Overall, the study emphasizes the pedagogical value of WCF in EFL writing instruction and calls for more interactive feedback practices and further research on its long-term effects and learner-related variables.