Administrative Challenges and Strategies for ETDs Management at Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh.

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) are essential for promoting research by enhancing accessibility, discoverability, and dissemination of scholarly knowledge. However, Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh encounter notable Administrative Challenges that hinder the efficient management of ETDs. This study aims to explore these Administrative Challenges and offer practical recommendations for the improvement of ETDs management at Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh.
Methodology: This study uses a descriptive research design to explore the Administrative Challenges associated with ETDs management at Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh. A mixed methods approach has been employed to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the research problem and to provide recommendations. Four out of seven Agricultural University Libraries were chosen as a sample for data collection. Primary data were collected through a Semi-structured questionnaire distributed to information professionals working in the selected sample Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh. The questionnaire used a Five-point Likert Scale to assess the perceived Administrative Challenges, and open-ended questions were used to get recommendations. Data were analyzed using Descriptive Statistics. Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha was applied to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire responses. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0. The analysis examined the Administrative Challenges and proposed recommendations for improving ETDs management practices at Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh.
Findings: The study revealed that 90% of ETDs repositories adopted DSpace software. The highest administrative challenge is concerns over electronic thesis quality, with a mean score of 5.0, and the lowest challenge is lack of promotion to raise ETD awareness, with a mean score of 3.25, and the overall average mean score of Administrative Challenges is 4.055, which is greater than the neutral point of 3. Indicating that Administrative Challenges are significantly present.
Implication: This study will provide a baseline for future research and policy making, offering insights into the improvement of ETDs management and facilitating a successful repository not only in Bangladesh but also in other developing countries' university libraries.
Originality/Value: This study represents the first initiative to explore the Administrative Challenges of ETDs management in Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh. It provides a valuable baseline for future research and policymaking, contributing to the global research community.